A Secret Weapon For criminal case information about laws of pakistan
nine . Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The legislation enjoins the police to be scrupulously fair for the offender and also the Magistracy is to make certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court and from other courts Nonetheless they have didn't have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The a good amount of this power casts an obligation over the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for any crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.Article 199 of the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other enough remedy is provided by law." It is actually very well-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust offered remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether People remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI forty six SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have listened to the learned counsel for that parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments given that the issues on the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard to the interim relief application in terms of Section seven(1) from the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 to hand over possession of your subjected premises towards the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to generally be decided through the competent court after hearing the parties if pending given that the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer inside the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court must see this aspect for interim custody of the topic premises In case the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order.
The a lot of this power casts an obligation within the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for the crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. However it can be made distinct that police is free to consider action against any person who's indulged in criminal activities topic to legislation. 8. The DIGP concerned is directed to prioritize this matter and, after hearing both parties within two weeks, address the alleged police misconduct. In case the officials are found culpable, departmental proceedings for their punishment must be initiated, plus they shall be assigned non-subject duties from the interim period. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 113 Order Date: 08-APR-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Therefore, this petition is found to become not maintainable which is dismissed along with the pending application(s), as well as the petitioners may perhaps seek out remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more
Though there is not any prohibition against referring to case legislation from a state other than the state in which the case is being heard, it holds minimal sway. Still, if there isn't any precedent within the home state, relevant case regulation from another state could possibly be regarded as by the court.
In 1996, the Nevada Division of Child and Family Services (“DCFS”) removed a 12-year outdated boy from his home to protect him from the Awful physical and sexual abuse he had endured in his home, also to prevent him from abusing other children within the home. The boy was placed within an emergency foster home, and was later shifted close to within the foster care system.
168 . H.C.A 203/2016 (D.B.) Saleh Muhammad V/S Faqir Muhammad & others Sindh High Court, Karachi Topic: Appeal At times it's practical for your Judge to dismiss the suit for non-prosecution, however, a Judge is under the obligation for making an attempt to get rid of a case on benefit and more importantly when after recording of here evidence it has attained to the stage of final arguments, endeavors should be made for merit disposal when it's got achieved these kinds of stage. Read more
163 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is very well-settled that although considering the case of normal promotion of civil servants, the competent authority has to think about the merit of many of the qualified candidates and after due deliberations, to grant promotion to these eligible candidates who are found being most meritorious among them. Since the petitioner was held to get senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was overlooked by the respondent department just to increase favor towards the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy to the part of your respondent department.
Article 199 with the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other suitable remedy is provided by law." It truly is very well-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust accessible remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether Individuals remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
162 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It can be nicely-settled that the civil servants must first pursue internal appeals within ninety times. If the appeal isn't decided within that timeframe, he/she will then method the service tribunal to challenge the initial order. Once they are doing so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, as being the ninety times for the department to act has already expired. To the aforesaid proposition, we have been guided because of the decision of the Supreme Court during the case of Dr.
Statutory laws are All those created by legislative bodies, including Congress at both the federal and state levels. Whilst this variety of legislation strives to shape our society, giving rules and guidelines, it would be unattainable for any legislative body to anticipate all situations and legal issues.
156 . Const. P. 1015/2021 (D.B.) Muhammad Saleem Jehangir V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Additionally it is important to note that neither seniority nor promotion will be the vested right of the civil servant, therefore, neither any seniority nor any promotion could possibly be claimed or granted without the actual length of service on account of vested rights. The purpose of prescribing a particular size of service for turning out to be entitled to be deemed for promotion to the higher grade, of course, is not really without logic as being the officer who is originally inducted to a particular post needs to provide on the mentioned post to gain experience to hold the next higher post also to serve the public inside of a befitting method.
Criminal cases Inside the common regulation tradition, courts decide the law applicable into a case by interpreting statutes and implementing precedents which record how and why prior cases have been decided. As opposed to most civil legislation systems, common regulation systems follow the doctrine of stare decisis, by which most courts are bound by their have previous decisions in similar cases. According to stare decisis, all reduce courts should make decisions steady with the previous decisions of higher courts.